Menu Content/Inhalt
Home

Welcome to Mast Sanity

We are the primary national organisation opposing the insensitive siting of mobile phone and Tetra masts in the UK. Read more...
Visitors: 562747

Like this article? Spread the news by clicking below:

Is Colony Collapse the Price of E.M.F. Progress?

Presentation to the Beekeepers Association, Glastonbury 9th August 2008 

bee collecting pollen

Mr Ferguson purchased a Georgian house in Bath.  The only problem appeared to be 30 nests of bees sharing the same property.  Everything was tried to rid his house of bees, but all efforts failed.  Then Mr Ferguson installed a WiFi system;  the bees left and never returned. (1) 

Similarly, when University Scientists placed a DECT phone near hives, both the weight of the honeycomb and the numbers of bees returning to the hive decreased.  During one experiment, no bees at all returned. (2) 

The common denominator here is that both WiFi and DECT transmit microwaves, common to mobile phones, TETRA, all similar devices and their transmitters.  Microwaves are made up of both electric (like static) fields and magnetic (like magnets) fields. 

Bees use the Earth's magnetic field to help them both position themselves and navigate.  To do this, they have magnetic materials in their heads, thoraxes and abdomens. (3)   These particular magnetic materials can be re-magnetised by a stronger magnetic field (it is one way of making magnets).  Once magnetised this stronger field will remain.  Subsequently, their particular directional finding mechanisms can inadvertently misdirect them.

Let's put this into some sort of perspective:

Honeybees have been shown to be sensitive to magnetic field differences of (1nT) one thousand millionth of one magnetic unit (the Tesla). (4)   The Earth has both an horizontal and vertical magnetic field which the honeybee will both detect and use for positioning.  Permitted magnetic field levels from transmitters are roughly 640 times greater than that of the bee's most sensitive level;  this is without considering any pulsing and accumulative effects from other nearby transmitters - e.g. mobile phones and WiFi.  The Earth's magnetic field is a static field, whereas the transmitters use an oscillating field;  these fields have different properties.  Imagine you are driving along a strange motorway and, instead of seeing one traffic sign, you see 640! 

A problem humans living near transmitters often encounter is acoustic vibration (vibrating pipes, metallic conduits, even bed-springs),  sometimes called resonance.  Any constant rhythmic variation from a force (wind/electromagnetic/mechanical) can cause resonance in the atomic layout if the recipient/object is "tuned in" to that frequency. 

Both the brain and the body of a honeybee can vibrate (resonate) from some of the frequencies used by the Communications Industry.  Bees also "waggle-dance" to communicate within the hive;  this "waggle-dance" sends vibrations used for communication throughout the honeycomb. (1)(5) 

The frequency of vibrations for the honeybees' "waggle-dance" are set at around 200-300 Hz (vibrations per second).  This also is the pulsing frequency used by some mobile phone transmitters. (6)   Hence, it is a viable proposition to assume that some hives near transmitters must be continually forced to vibrate, day and night, sending possible inappropriate signals. 

The Varroa mite is often mentioned, along with other infestations or diseases, as a cause of the demise of bees.  However, colonies of Varroa-resistant bees are also suffering. (7)   As both Dr Carlo (8) and Alex Roslin (9) say: 

Firstly - the problem is sudden and global, suggesting it is a global source;   the coincidence here is the tripling of global microwave background radiation.  Secondly - normally with a disease or virus the bees die within or near their hives, but now, in most reported cases, the bees are simply disappearing. 

As one bee-keeper said on Spotlight BBC News from the Royal Cornwall County Show (6.6.08) "It is like a giant hoover just comes out of the sky and sucks them up". 

In other situations where bees have maintained their usual numbers, it is reported that their immune systems are collapsing (10)  and/or their metabolic rate is suppressed. (2)   This is not surprising.  I believe the proof has been staring us in the face for years, but it has been overlooked. 

When Universities embark upon lengthy research studies concerning microwave radiation and resulting cellular effects, they often use small mammals and/or invertebrates.  The resulting data is written up and published.  However, in all of the range of research I have studied, one critical conclusion has not been clearly identified:  there is a direct, indisputable correlation between what is shown under experimental conditions and what is already happening within the natural environment.  This is to say, if low-level microwave radiation has been found to suppress the immune system (using everyday levels) in the Laboratory, it will also suppress the immune system outside the Laboratory - in everyday living. 

Exacerbating everything already mentioned is "HAARP".  Using approximately 180 transmitters spread over 30 acres, with a power rating of 3.6 million watts or more, this Alaskan super-transmitter could probably disorientate the best part of a country's entire bee population if it were aimed in that direction, at an appropriate angle (to reflect from the ionosphere). (11) (12)   "HAARP" may be the biggest transmitter in the World, but it is by no means the only super cluster of transmitters to be found.  A look at any military site will show this. 

Within my capacity as a scientific adviser, I receive many research papers from all over the World and I believe that what is happening to bees is also happening to other living things.  I have a plethora of research on: 

Butterflies, trees, plants, birds (including white stork, pigeons, sparrows and migratory birds), swamp life, frogs, bats, ants (who use the Earth's magnetic field for direction) cattle and whales ("HAARP" can be used to communicate to submarines). 

The common denominators are:  all have suffered from the installation of nearby microwave transmitters (as used by the Mobile Phone Companies), and they either use the Earth's magnetic field for navigation, or they are exposed to ground-currents (or both). 

It seems that this scenario follows the worldwide proliferation of the Communications Industry.  I can no longer find a trouble-free country where mobile phones, WiFi, TETRA, blue-tooth, etc., are being used. 

Bees use similar thinking mechanisms as humans - that is, they can memorise and organise.(13) (14)    If a strong magnet is placed near a hive under construction, a strange-looking comb will be produced. (5) 

The bee is this planet's most sensitive proprioceptive animal (using Earth's magnetism and vibration to feel, position and orientate).  Clearly, if a cluster of magnetic-wave-transmitting antennae are introduced into the bees' environment, it will try to find a more tolerable territory - possibly exhausting it's energy and dying in the process. 

Not only are we interfering with the physical properties of this planet, upon which our evolution has been based, but we are putting at risk the very foundations of our food chains and webs. 

As a physicist and teacher of science, if I were asked to devise a mechanism to eliminate bees from the planet, I would suggest the deployment of communications transmitters, using pulsed (modulated) microwaves, which penetrate every part of this planet.  There is absolutely nowhere the bees can go to escape such microwaves. 

CONCLUSION

I believe that microwaves from the new communications systems are suppressing the immune responses of the bee, leaving them susceptible to infection, causing their magnetic orienting capability to become compromised.

THE WAY FORWARD

There is a new law;  it is called the European Habitat Directive, which states "It is illegal to harm protected species or disrupt their habitat".

Barrie Trower

Scientific Adviser to: Radiation Research Trust (UK), H.E.S.E (International), Electrosensitivity (UK)

Read more...
 
Please Support the ES-EHS Petition
Please read and support the following petition to acknowledge ES/EHS in the UK:-

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/ES-EHSPetition/

The petition reads:

"We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to ask you to investigate fully the plight of increasing numbers of people who have become electro-sensitive (ES) or electro-hypersensitive (EHS) in the UK due to electricity or the new pulsed microwave radiation technologies such as TETRA, mobile phones and masts, WiFi, radar, cordless phones and a host of “wireless” gadgets.

We also ask you to:

1. Demand independent research into this “FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT CAUSED BY ENVIRONMENTAL TRIGGERS” - which does have a distinguishing feature from other illnesses/conditions with similar symptoms i.e. the ES/EHS CAN AND DO recover if they are isolated from the cause(s) of the sensitivity.

2. Demand monitoring by personnel trained or researching in this field who are aware of the effects of pulsed microwave radiation/electricity.

3 Ensure that the Human Rights of the ES/EHS are observed fully and recognise electro-sensitivity as a disability in the UK, as in Canada and Sweden.

4 Provide safe zones so that the ES/EHS have places to recover/live in OR replace pulsed microwave radiation with a safer technology.
"
 
Please also remember to support the Wi-fi Petitions whilst you are at the PM's site:-
 
Please look at and sign the following petition to remove Wi-fi from schools.
Please also look at and sign the following petition to remove the wi-fi mesh from Glastonbury town centre - especially if you live in, near or intend to visit the town.
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/whywi-fi/
 
Larry King on Cell Phone Safety - 29th July 2008
 
29th July 2008 : Another Larry King show on mobile phones

From Cindy Sage:

Tonight, the Larry King Live show carried another half an hour panel discussion on the cell phone/brain tumor question. The speakers were:

Devra Davis of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Keith Black, MD of Cedars Sinai Hospital, Otis W. Brawley, the chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society, Sanjay Gupta, CNN’s chief medical correspondent, Paul Song, a radiation oncologist in Los Angeles and Ted Schwartz, a brain surgeon at the Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center in New York City.

This is a watershed moment. Devra Davis was brilliant and had the most in-depth information and focus. The panel endorsed precaution by reducing exposure to cell phones, use of wired earpieces for all calls, and very limited (if any) use of cell phones by young children. There was good support for Ron Herberman’s warning on cell phones to the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Center employees and staff.

Sanjay Gupta held up Om Gandhi’s color images of cell phone RF in the brain of a 5-year old, 10-year old and adult.
He finally jumped the fence on this issue, as apparently did the American Cancer Society.

Even the American Cancer Society’s Otis Brawley agreed that precaution is warranted since we don’t know what may happen 20-30 years out. For the first time in the US, the experts sounded like they believe the early evidence warrants taking some precautionary public health actions now, and warning the public about what we do know (except Ted Schwartz, who says we should wait).

Brawley, the American Cancer Society rep…. responded to an email asking “what should the US public health response be if the Interphone Study shows a doubling of risk, as some earlier studies have done?” by saying:

“I think we’re going to have to look at the Interphone Study very carefully. It’s actually been completed for about two and a half years and the people who actually ran the study have yet to publish it. There’s a lot of discussions going on amongst those scientists as to exactly what the data show. And it would be really nice if it were published, I must tell you.”

Larry King pointed out that he’d invited many of the cell phone manufacturers, but none would attend.
CTIA filed a written statement disavowing any risks, citing WHO, the FDA and the American Cancer Society.

The link to the transcript of the show is: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0807/29/lkl.01.html

Cindy Sage
Co-Editor
BioInitiative Report
CHE-EMF Working Group
Dear Cindy, and all,
I was unable to listen to the Larry King show last night but have just read the transcript. Overall, I thought it was good with reservations.
What was not said, and this is of the utmost importance, is that the Interphone Study's design flaws are so fundamental that the Study's main finding is that use of the a cellphone protects the user from a brain tumor.
Yet the Interphone Study is being held up as though it will give the definitive answer. Dr. Schwartz stated, "... the currently available literature is at best inconclusive about whether there's a link between cell phone use and brain tumors." Dr. Brawley stated, "I think we're going to have to look at the Interphone Study very carefully."
I would urge everyone on this email, if you have any contact with the media, to make it clear that the Interphone study is the reason that the literature is inconclusive, and because the Interphone Study has 10 major design flaws, each underestimating the risk of brain tumors, its major finding is the use of a cellphone protects the user from brain tumors.
Attached [click here] is the presentation I gave at the Bioelectromagnetics Society (BEMS) meeting showing the design flaws (the presentation has 9 flaws; one flaw was edited from the presentation due to time limitation). If anyone would like a more in-depth understanding, please contact me.
Regards to all,
Lloyd Morgan
PS: Cindy great job getting your email read on the show!!
To watch the programme click on "Read more..." below

Read more...
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next > End >>

Results 1 - 14 of 71

Login / Join Mast Sanity

Help Us Do More! Donate via:

Enter Amount:

Or Send Donations by post to:

Mast Sanity
c/o Highfields
Brantham Hill,
Manningtree, Essex
CO11 1SD

Phone Mast News Feeds

News Now News Now
Google News Google News Feed
Powerwatch Powerwatch News Feed
** New** ES-UK ES-UK News Feed
MS Research Mast Sanity Research News Feed
MS News Mast Sanity News Feed

 

MS Toolbar


toolbar powered by Conduit