Welcome to Mast Sanity

We are the primary national organisation opposing the insensitive siting of mobile phone and Tetra masts in the UK. Read more...

Phone Mast News Feeds

News Now News Now
Google News Google News Feed
Powerwatch Powerwatch News Feed
** New** ES-UK ES-UK News Feed
MS Research Mast Sanity Research News Feed
MS News Mast Sanity News Feed

Donate

Please consider supporting our efforts.

Amount: 

Or Send Donations by post to:

Mast Sanity
c/o Highfields
Brantham Hill,
Manningtree, Essex
CO11 1SD

PRESS RELEASE By The BioInitiative:-

University of Albany, New York– August 31 / Serious Public Health Concerns
Raised Over Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) from Power
Lines and Cell Phones


An international working group of scientists, researchers and public health policy
professionals (The BioInitiative Working Group) has released its report on
electromagnetic fields (EMF) and health. It raises serious concern about the
safety of existing public limits that regulate how much EMF is allowable from
power lines, cell phones, and many other sources of EMF exposure in daily life.
Electromagnetic radiation from such sources as electric power lines, interior
wiring and grounding of buildings and appliances are linked to increased risks for
childhood leukemia and may set the stage for adult cancers later in life. A report
from the BioInitiative Working Group (www.bioinitiative.org) released on Friday,
August 31st documents the scientific evidence that power line EMF exposure is
responsible for hundreds of new cases of childhood leukemia every year in the
United States and around the world.


The report provides detailed scientific information on health impacts when people
are exposed to electromagnetic radiation hundreds or even thousands of times
below limits currently established by the Federal Communications Commission
(US FCC) and International Commission for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection in
Europe (ICNIRP). The authors reviewed more than 2000 scientific studies and
reviews, and concluded that the existing public safety limits are inadequate to
protect public health. From a public health policy standpoint, new public safety
limits, and limits on further deployment of risky technologies are warranted based
on the total weigh of evidence.


The report documents scientific evidence raising worries about childhood
leukemia (from power lines and other electrical exposures), brain tumors and
acoustic neuromas (from cell and cordless phones) and Alzheimer’s disease.
There is evidence that EMF is a risk factor for both childhood and adult cancers.
Public health expert and co-editor of the Report Dr. David Carpenter, Director,
Institute for Health and the Environment at the University of Albany, New York
says “this report stands as a wake-up call that long-term exposure to some kinds
of EMF may cause serious health effects. Good public health planning is needed
now to prevent cancers and neurological diseases linked to exposure to power
lines and other sources of EMF. We need to educate people and our decisionmakers
that “business as usual” is unacceptable.”


Health questions about power line EMFs were initially raised by Nancy
Wertheimer, a Colorado public health expert and Ed Leeper, an electrical
engineer in 1979. Wertheimer noticed that children were twice or three times as
likely to have leukemia tended to live in homes in the Denver, CO area close to
power lines and transformers. Now, there are dozens of studies confirming the
link, but public health response has been slow in coming, and new standards to
protect the public are necessary.


Brain tumor specialist Dr. Lennart Hardell, MD, PhD and Professor at University
Hospital in Orebro, Sweden is a member of the BioInitiative Working Group. His
work on cell phones, cordless phones and brain tumors is widely recognized to
be pivotal in the debate about the safety of wireless radiofrequency and
microwave radiation. “The evidence for risks from prolonged cell phone and
cordless phone use is quite strong when you look at people who have used these
devices for 10 years or longer, and when they are used mainly on one side of the
head.


Brain tumors normally take a long time to develop, on the order of 15 to 20 years.
Use of a cell or cordless phone is linked to brain tumors and acoustic neuromas
(tumor of the auditory nerve in the brain) and are showing up after only 10 years
(a shorter time period than for most other known carcinogens). “This indicates
we need research on more long-term users to understand the full risks” says Dr.
Hardell.


Dr. Hardell’s work has been confirmed in other studies on long-term users. A
summary estimate of all studies on brain tumors shows overall a 20% increased
risk of brain tumor (malignant glioma) with ten years of use. But the risk
increases to 200% (a doubling of risk) for tumors on the same side of the brain
as mainly used during cell phone calls. “Recent studies that do not report
increased risk of brain tumors and acoustic neuromas have not looked at heavy
users, use over ten years or longer, and do not look at the part of the brain which
would reasonably have exposure to produce a tumor.”


Wireless technologies that rely on microwave radiation to send emails and voice
communication are thousands of times stronger than levels reported to cause
some health impacts. Prolonged exposure to radiofrequency and microwave
radiation from cell phones, cordless phones, cell towers, WI-FI and other wireless
technologies have linked to physical symptoms including headache, fatigue,
sleeplessness, dizziness, changes in brainwave activity, and impairment of
concentration and memory. Scientists report that these effects can occur with
even very small levels of exposure, if it occurs on a daily basis. Children in
particular are vulnerable to harm from environmental exposures of all kinds.
Co-editor of the report, Cindy Sage of Sage Associates says “public health and
EMF policy experts have now given their opinion of the weight of evidence. The
existing FCC and international limits for public and occupational exposure to
electromagnetic fields and radiofrequency radiation are not protective of public
health. New biologically-based public and occupational exposure are
recommended to address bioeffects and potential adverse health effects of
chronic exposure. These effects are now widely reported to occur at exposure
levels significantly below most current national and international limits.”
Biologically-based exposure standards are needed to prevent disruption of
normal body processes. Effects are reported for DNA damage (genotoxicity that
is directly linked to integrity of the human genome), cellular communication,
cellular metabolism and repair, cancer surveillance within the body; and for
protection against cancer and neurological diseases. Also reported are
neurological effects including changes in brainwave activity during cell phone
calls, impairment of memory, attention and cognitive function; sleep disorders,
cardiac effects; and changes in immune function (allergic and inflammatory
responses).


Sage says “the Working Group recommends a biologically-based exposure limit
that is protective against extremely-low frequency (power line) and
radiofrequency fields which, with chronic exposure, can reasonably be presumed
to result in significant impacts to health and well-being”.


Contributing author Dr. Martin Blank, Columbia University professor and
researcher in bioelectromagnetics says “cells in the body react to EMFs as
potentially harmful, just like to other environmental toxins, including heavy metals
and toxic chemicals. The DNA in living cells recognizes electromagnetic fields at
very low levels of exposure; and produces a biochemical stress response. The
scientific evidence tells us that our safety standards are inadequate, and that we
must protect ourselves from exposure to EMF due to powerlines, cell phones and
the like.” He wrote the section on stress proteins for the BioInitiative Report.


Contact: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. (open on August 31, 2007)


Report: available at www.bioinitiative.org (on August 31, 2007)


Title: BioInitiative: A Rationale for a Biologically-based Public Exposure
Standard for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF)